Alexander W. Dreyfoos School of the Arts | 501 S. Sapodilla Ave, WPB, FL 33401

THE MUSE

Happening Now
  • April 22Streaming Canvas on April 26 at 6 p.m. in Meyer Hall
  • April 22AICE English General Paper Exam on April 25 at 8:00 a.m.
  • April 22Chamber Recital Concert on April 24 at 6:00 p.m. in the Norton Museum
  • April 22NHS Meeting on April 24 at 11:19 a.m. in the Media Center
  • April 22Spring into College Series on April 23 at 11:19 a.m. in the Media Center
Alexander W. Dreyfoos School of the Arts | 501 S. Sapodilla Ave, WPB, FL 33401

THE MUSE

Alexander W. Dreyfoos School of the Arts | 501 S. Sapodilla Ave, WPB, FL 33401

THE MUSE

UNNECESSARY SEQUELS AND SPINOFFS

UNNECESSARY+SEQUELS+AND+SPINOFFS
Photo courtesy of Michael Yarish/Netflix

As much as the internet loves “Shrek,” we all know it didn’t need a third movie. There are countless TV shows, films, and even books that we all can agree didn’t need to have a sequel. We are looking at you, “The Cursed Child” in the Harry Potter series. It’s hard to explain why these sequels even exist to begin with, but it happens so often. So what’s the catch?

While we all used to love “That’s So Raven,” “Full House,” and “Boy Meets World,” we can see that their newer reboots pale in comparison. Honestly, when has anyone been excited over watching the next episode of “Fuller House?” Even the most iconic TV shows have terrible spinoffs. Take the infamous “Friends” show; Joey,  a character while beloved by all, after receiving his own spin off called “Joey,” it ultimately flopped after two seasons.

Largely, the widespread reasoning for absolute disappointment is because it’s not the original, and many feel bitter resentment towards the original shows’ demise, and the start of the new spin off. Much like the same feeling one might get when finishing their favorite book, trying to find another book that leaves the same satisfactory emotion is difficult;it doesn’t have the same plot, characters, and overall sentiment that you had when enjoying the first.Photo courtesy of Paramount Pictures

Not only are these unnecessary sequels and spinoffs spoiling the originals for the viewer, it’s degrading the film and television industry. Instead of producing new content, all movie-goers and binge-watchers get to see is the same thing regurgitated over and over again. In a study done by Yahoo Entertainment, the number of original films has dropped below 25 percent, down from 60 percent in 1984. Sorry Bumblebee from “Transformers,” we didn’t really need all five movies with a sixth one just for you on the way. “Transformers” obviously isn’t the only franchise to do this, but it definitely calls into question as to why Hollywood keeps making them.

It may seem trite (and that’s because it is), but it largely has to do with the box-office value. If a movie or television show is successful on the first go-around, of course it would make sense to double dip for that extra cash. “Fast and Furious” has been going on for 15 years and every time a new movie was released, people have flooded the theaters. According to Box Office Mojo, each of the past three sequels since 2009 has made more money than the previous film.

Foreign gross box office also needs to be considered. While the aforementioned failure of “Transformers” might be true for the U.S., places like China make this movie a big success because their own film industry does not focus on that genre of movies. According to Forbes, the 2017 movie, “Transformers: The Last Knight” only pulled in $68 million on the first long weekend, compared to China’s box office of $125 million. This large incentive for money keeps filmmakers going.

Regardless of anyone’s personal sentiments towards these seemingly unnecessary sequels and spinoffs, they are going to be around for a long time continuing after every successful original film. There’s a place for every movie in the film industry, and whether it’s across the seas or on our TV screens, someone out there can appreciate them.

Leave a Comment
Donate to THE MUSE
$750
$10000
Contributed
Our Goal

Your donation will support the student journalists of Dreyfoos School of the Arts. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.

Navigate Left
Navigate Right
About the Contributor
Chloe Girod
Chloe Girod, Editor-in-Chief
Chloe Girod is a third-year staffer as well as the Editor-in-Chief of The Muse. She thrives off validation and can often be an absolute fool when stressed, but she tries to maintain a positive outlook in all aspects of her life. She loves to challenge people and their ideas, including herself, which can spark a few controversial discussions. She has a weird obsession with kids shows like “Boss Baby” as well as “Phineas and Ferb” for their childish humor. She strives to delve into all journalism topics while keeping a special place for her old Entertainment section in her heart as well as focus on her graphics and page design. One day she hopes to be her own boss, baby. Until then, she’s just prepping for the future and praying her semi-decent SAT scores get her into college. This will be her final year on the staff, which she looks back on with happy memories and love.   If you would like to contact this staffer, you may reach them at [email protected]
Donate to THE MUSE
$750
$10000
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (0)

Posting under a pseudonym is not permitted. Online comments that are found in violation of the editorial policy will be removed as quickly as possible.
All THE MUSE Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *